GovernColossalX Trust Enginex, accounted for

ColossalX Trust Engine: a trust score that explains itself.

One grade across five pillars, built from live evidence, that says what pulls it down and what would raise it.

How it works

Specs

ColossalX Trust Engine, in detail

Delivery and data

Delivery
SaaS, from one login.
Isolation
Each customer runs in an isolated workspace with its own database.
Certifications
None held. Frameworks are mapped to and assessed against.

Frameworks

NIST AI RMF
Mapped to: Read by the compliance pillar.
EU AI Act
Mapped to: Read by the compliance pillar.
See the frameworks

Last reviewed 6 Oct 2026

Trust score · five pillarsIllustrative

Trust score · five pillars: C. Security measured; Compliance measured; Risk measured; Resilience not measured; AI governance measured. Provisional: resilience has no evidence yet

In short

The ColossalX Trust Engine is an AI trust score that explains itself. It grades your AI estate A+ to F across five pillars, security, compliance, risk, resilience and AI governance, from live evidence. A pillar with no evidence carries no weight, a grade on thin evidence is marked provisional, and the page names the action that would raise it.

The board is shown a security score nobody can explain, built partly on missing data.

ColossalX leaves out what it has no evidence for, marks the grade provisional, and says why.

How it works

From a provisional grade to the action that raises it.

A grade that rests on thin evidence: marked provisional, explained pillar by pillar, and linked to the action that would supply what is missing.

Workflow · a provisional grade, explainedIllustrative

01 Pillars read

Each pillar is scored from live evidence across the platform.

02 Marked provisional

The grade rests on thin evidence, so it is labelled provisional.

03 Explained

It names the pillar costing most points and the distance to B.

04 Next action

Each missing piece links to the page that would supply it.

What you see

The score, explained pillar by pillar.

Each grade shows what pulls it down, the points the next grade needs, the evidence each pillar rests on and what is still missing.

  1. Five pillars, measuredSecurity, compliance, risk, resilience and AI governance, scored from live evidence.
  2. Provisional, not flatteringA thin grade is provisional; a pillar without evidence weighs nothing.
  3. Why, in plain wordsWhat pulls it down, and how far the next grade is.
  4. The action that helpsEach missing piece of evidence links to the page that supplies it.
Read the detail, step by step4
  1. Five pillars, measured. The score is assembled from the gateway and agent security, the compliance position, the risk register, resilience tests and AI-governance coverage, and recalculated continuously. Each pillar shows its weight, its score and how much of the evidence it is designed to use was available.
  2. Provisional, not flattering. Anything with no evidence yet is left out rather than guessed, and listed with what would provide it. A grade must clear a boundary by a margin before it changes, so it does not flicker between two grades.
  3. Why, in plain words. A per-pillar table shows weight, score, evidence coverage, points held and points lost, so the cost of each weak pillar is visible.
  4. The action that helps. Typical actions: run a compliance assessment, run a restore drill, route traffic through the gateway, register agents or map AI-governance controls.
Trust score, explainedIllustrative

An illustrative trust score, explained: five pillars with the evidence behind each, resilience shown as not measured rather than zero, a passing re-test that lifts the risk pillar and moves the grade from D to C (still provisional), and what would raise it next.

3notes
  1. Provisional while evidence is thin
  2. Not measured, never scored zero
  3. What would raise the grade

How it connectsx, accounted for

Where the score is read next.

The score is read wherever a leader asks where the estate stands.

  1. The overview

    The trust grade, its trend and the five pillar scores sit on the home overview.

  2. Insights

    A falling score raises an insight, ranked with the measurements behind it.

  3. The risk pillar reads the same register that FAIR quantifies in money.

  4. The compliance pillar reads the same framework position, computed one way.

Honest by design

What it does, and what it does not.

Pillar · no evidence yetIllustrative

Pillar · no evidence yet: Pillar Resilience; Evidence None provided yet; Weight None until evidenced; Grade Provisional; Would supply it A restore drill. Left out, not guessed.

What it does not do

x, not measured

There is no downloadable trust report yet; the export in the API returns data, not a document.

All 4 limits
  • Pillar weights and grade thresholds can be changed only through the API, not on screen.
  • The score grades the AI estate as a whole; there is no per-asset trust score.
  • The trust figure on an agent's page is a separate measure, not this grade.

How we know

  • A pillar with no evidence carries no weight, so a missing source never counts as zero.
  • A grade on too little evidence is labelled provisional, not passed or failed.
  • Only measured resilience tests count toward the resilience pillar.
  • A grade must clear its boundary by a margin, so it does not flicker.

Questions

Questions buyers ask

What is an AI trust score?

An AI trust score is a single grade for how safe and well governed an organisation's AI is. The ColossalX Trust Engine builds it from five pillars of live evidence, grades it A+ to F, and shows why: which pillars pull it down, which evidence is missing and what would raise it.

What are the five pillars?

Security, from the gateway and agent security; compliance, from the framework position; risk, from the register; resilience, from measured chaos experiments and restore drills; and AI governance, from AI control coverage. Each pillar shows its weight, its score and how much of the evidence it is designed to use was available.

Why is a grade sometimes marked provisional?

Because it rests on too little evidence to be trusted as a pass or a fail. A pillar with no evidence carries no weight, so a missing source is left out rather than counted as zero, and the grade says provisional until the evidence arrives. The page lists what would provide it.

What raises the score?

Evidence and fixes. The page names the pillars costing most points and how far the next grade is, and links each missing piece of evidence to the action that supplies it, such as a restore drill, a compliance assessment, routing traffic through the gateway or registering agents. A proven fix to a red-team gap moves the resilience pillar.

How does the score reach the board?

The grade, its trend and the pillar scores sit on the home overview, and a falling score raises an insight with the measurements behind it. Board reporting runs through the reports hub, where reports are branded, scheduled and signed off by a second person; a downloadable trust report itself is not available yet.

Related

Next step

Account for your x.

See the ColossalX Trust Engine on your own estate: the grade, the reasons and the next action.

  1. 01Tell us what you run
  2. 02See the four verbs on it
  3. 03Decide where to start